Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
dyc_2008
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 9:03 am

Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#1 Post by dyc_2008 » Mon May 14, 2012 10:34 am

dear all

I am so confused by the three type of energy.
The physics meaning of them is clear, but i just don't know how to chose the suitable one .

is there any correlation between the suitable choice and the parameters in the INCAR , such as ISMERA and IBRION?

furthermore, is there any difference between energy without entropy and energy(sigma->0)? in my opinion, when sigma->0 ,the entropy is zero.
however, in many calculations , energy without entropy and energy(sigma->0) are not equal

Thanks
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Last edited by dyc_2008 on Mon May 14, 2012 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

tlchan

Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#2 Post by tlchan » Wed May 16, 2012 3:52 am

[quote="dyc_2008"]
furthermore, is there any difference between energy without entropy and energy(sigma->0)? in my opinion, when sigma->0 ,the entropy is zero. however, in many calculations , energy without entropy and energy(sigma->0) are not equal
[/quote]
For energy (sigma->0), I think there is an extrapolation formula to estimate the value of the total energy corresponding to sigma=0 by using a sigma>0 result. The total energy without entropy simply subtracts the electronic thermal energy away from the calculated total energy.
Last edited by tlchan on Wed May 16, 2012 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

dyc_2008
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 9:03 am

Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#3 Post by dyc_2008 » Wed May 16, 2012 3:56 am

that is a very brilliant interpretation
thank you so much
Last edited by dyc_2008 on Wed May 16, 2012 3:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

KWH
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:05 am
License Nr.: 5-1063

Re: Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#4 Post by KWH » Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:29 pm

I could use some help with this. In the O atom example on the Wiki, it says to use the "energy without entropy" for atoms and molecules. Other sources say use the sigma>0 approx always. This becomes especially important in desorption calculations where we are taking differences between systems using fermi smearing and gaussian smearing.

Can someone enlighten me on this issue?

fabien_tran1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:02 am

Re: Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#5 Post by fabien_tran1 » Wed Oct 19, 2022 12:50 pm

SIGMA should be primarily considered as a "technical" parameter for the integration into the Brillouin zone. In some cases, like the O atom, the entropy term can be much larger (than in bulk metals) and become unphysical (see wiki/index.php/O_atom). Note also that the default value of SIGMA is 0.2 eV, which corresponds to a temperature of about 2000 K.

fabien_tran1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 419
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:02 am

Re: Should we choose: Free energy TOTEN, energy without entropy or energy(sigma->0)?

#6 Post by fabien_tran1 » Wed Oct 19, 2022 1:01 pm

You can also have a look at ISMEAR.

Post Reply