Page 1 of 1

Raman

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 3:02 pm
by asiyeh_shokri2

Hello

I have questions about calculation of Raman Intensities using VASP which I appreciate any answer and guide. I am using (https://github.com/raman-sc/VASP) guide and program for a unitcell of 20 atoms.
using DFTP or finit displacement and EPSILON = True in INCAR file I see at the end of OUTCAR file there are all the Raman and IR modes of this material. So my question is if I do not want to plot the raman intensities, would it be enough to just do a single calculation using EPSILON = True and IBRION=5-8? how can I distinguish between IR and raman modes? Do I have to use a supercell for this calculation for a pure structure? what about doped crystals? In this case how should I compare my result while I will have for example 480 modes while for pure structure number of all modes is 30?

Best regards,
Asiyeh


Re: Raman

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2024 9:08 am
by fabien_tran1

Hi,

This is not completely clear what exactly you would like to do. Could you please rephrase your questions? This would help us to answer you. What is explained here may be helpful: Low-frequency corrections from atomic displacements


Re: Raman

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2024 1:09 pm
by alex

Hello Asiyeh,

if you do _not_ need Raman _intensities_ a normal frequency run as VASP provides is fully sufficient. You may chose IBRION in a way that suits your purpose best. LEPSILON does provide additional information you may or may not wish to have. Again: your choice.
Since VASP is lacking most of the interesting parts of group theory you have to apply selection rules to identify IR and/or Raman active modes yourself or with the help of third party software.
Concerning supercells it's a bit dependend on what you are after: for simple assignment the small cell might be enough, but for higher accuracy wrt. energy comparisons I'd go for a supercell simulation for the pure system, too. On the plus side you might identify degeneracies if you go away from harmonic approximation, e.g. with MD.

Good luck,

alex


Re: Raman

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:14 am
by asiyeh_shokri2
fabien_tran1 wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2024 9:08 am

Hi,

This is not completely clear what exactly you would like to do. Could you please rephrase your questions? This would help us to answer you. What is explained here may be helpful: Low-frequency corrections from atomic displacements

Hello

First of all, thank you for your response. When I perform DFPT or finite difference calculations (using IBRION = 5, 6, 7, or 8 ) , the OUTCAR file provides the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the dynamical matrix. It lists several frequencies, matching the expected number of IR and Raman modes, suggesting that both IR and Raman active modes are included.

My question is: if I only need the vibrational frequencies, are these calculations (IBRION = 5, 6, 7, or 8 ) sufficient? As far as I understand, extracting Raman tensors, intensities, activities, or polarization data would require additional tools like phonopy or raman_sc.

I hope my question is clear now.

Best regards,
Asiyeh


Re: Raman

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:36 am
by asiyeh_shokri2
alex wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2024 1:09 pm

Hello Asiyeh,

if you do _not_ need Raman _intensities_ a normal frequency run as VASP provides is fully sufficient. You may chose IBRION in a way that suits your purpose best. LEPSILON does provide additional information you may or may not wish to have. Again: your choice.
Since VASP is lacking most of the interesting parts of group theory you have to apply selection rules to identify IR and/or Raman active modes yourself or with the help of third party software.
Concerning supercells it's a bit dependend on what you are after: for simple assignment the small cell might be enough, but for higher accuracy wrt. energy comparisons I'd go for a supercell simulation for the pure system, too. On the plus side you might identify degeneracies if you go away from harmonic approximation, e.g. with MD.

Good luck,

alex

Hello Alex

Thank you so much for your respond. So if I correctly understand you the frequencies I see in the OUTCAR are the raman and IR modes I am looking for. Am I right?

Best regards,
Asiyeh


Re: Raman

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 11:55 am
by alex

Yes Asiyeh,

all(!) vibrational modes will be computed by every code. No matter of their intensity.
The vibrational modes are eigenvalues of the Hesse matrix (or Hessian).

For systems with symmetry selection rules may apply, which (dis-)allow intensity at the mode under consideration.
However, computing intensities (IR or Raman) always is based on the vibrational modes you get from the Hessian.
No other positions/energies are possible.

Cheers,

alex


Re: Raman

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2024 1:40 pm
by fabien_tran1
asiyeh_shokri2 wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2024 10:14 am

My question is: if I only need the vibrational frequencies, are these calculations (IBRION = 5, 6, 7, or 8 ) sufficient? As far as I understand, extracting Raman tensors, intensities, activities, or polarization data would require additional tools like phonopy or raman_sc.

Yes you are right.