Thermal Expansion using MLFF

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
Fermi1976
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:33 am
License Nr.: 5-2268

Thermal Expansion using MLFF

#1 Post by Fermi1976 » Tue Apr 22, 2025 7:11 pm

Dear VASP Forum,
I am interested in calculating the thermal expansion coefficient of graphite using MLFF, so I can utilize the temperature-dependent lattice constants later on to perform temperature-dependent phonon calculations. I have been trying using NPT, but I have some issues, I will be grateful if you could give some advices how to improve the calculations.

I am attaching the INCAR ML_LOGFILE files. I used 288 atoms, 3x3x3 k-mesh.
I am attaching also, the Bayesian error, RMSE, volume, Temp and c-lattice constant as a function of MD steps.

My questions are as follow:
1- There is a sharp drop in the volume (mainly due to the drop in c-lattice constant). This happened in the training stage (below 6000 MS steps). I appreciate your feedback for this issue
2- The number of the AB configurations is 94, how can increase this number to improve the quality of the FF?

Thank you

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ferenc_karsai
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:44 pm

Re: Thermal Expansion using MLFF

#2 Post by ferenc_karsai » Wed Apr 23, 2025 7:54 am

Can you please send us all your files even if they are big (XDATCAR, POSCAR, POTCAR, ML_AB/N, ICONST, OUTCAR).
I would like to have a look at the trajectory, have you done so?

I already saw a type in your INCAR file. You wrote "Ecut = 600". I guess you meant "ENCUT = 600".

What you can try in the meantime:
-) Use ENCUT= 600 instead of the typo.
-) Try a different PMASS.
-) Try a different van der Waals (IVDW=10).

But these are only guesses, so I'm not sure any of these will help you.


Fermi1976
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:33 am
License Nr.: 5-2268

Re: Thermal Expansion using MLFF

#3 Post by Fermi1976 » Thu Apr 24, 2025 2:58 am

1- Thank you for finding the Ecut typo. I am repeating the calculations using ENCUT=600. I doubt this will make significant difference since ENMAX =400 in OTCAR and I am using PREC= Accurate (==> ENCUT ~520 eV).
I am wondering why VAPS did not show any warning of this typo.

2- I tried different PMASS values (1000, 2000, 3000), I did not get noticeable difference.

3- I tested different IVDW, IVDW=10 gave c = 6.39 A, which is far from the experimental value of 6.67 A. Whereas using IVDW=12 shows better prediction of c- value (6.66 A).

4- I will find away to send you the files you requested, they are so big.

Thank you again, I appreciate your willingness to help.


Fermi1976
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2017 11:33 am
License Nr.: 5-2268

Re: Thermal Expansion using MLFF

#4 Post by Fermi1976 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:05 pm

Hi ferenc_karsai,
Could you please send me your email so I can share with you a link to access the files?

Regards,
Iyad


Post Reply