molecular crystal BSE spectra

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
subrata
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:33 am
License Nr.: 5-2085

molecular crystal BSE spectra

#1 Post by subrata » Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:23 am

Hi,
I was trying to generate BSE spectra for NH3 molecular crystal from a paper

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01058

(see Figure 3 of the paper)

However, the BSE spectra I obtain are very different from those in their paper. Although the GW band gap matches perfectly.

Is there any reason that different codes can obtain different BSE spectra?

I am attaching my BSE spectra and all of my BSE calculation files.

Thanks
Subrata

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

fabien_tran1
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 11:02 am

Re: molecular crystal BSE spectra

#2 Post by fabien_tran1 » Fri Apr 25, 2025 2:30 pm

Hi,

My colleague Alexey Tal (BSE expert) and I had a look at your input files. The parameters lead to GW and BSE results that are clearly underconverged with respect to the number of bands and k-points.

This is particularly the case for the BSE calculation since NBANDSV=1 and NBANDSO=1, while they should bet set to at least 12 in order to take into account all possible transitions up to 12 eV as in Fig. 3 of the paper (this can be deduced by looking at the GW quasiparticles energies). The number of k-points may also be too small.

Also, the GW band gap that we obtained is 7.1 eV, while 7.7. eV is reported in the paper. Thus, the number of k-points and NBANDS should be tested in the GW calculation.

Besides, it was also not possible to reproduce the spectrum that you generated. Did you really extract the imaginary part of the dielectric function printed in vasprun.xml or vaspout.h5? For future posts, please provide also the OUTCAR files of your calculations.


Post Reply